The four-product loop, all inside one terminal
Agent Terminal is where Wispr, Brain, and Harness actually meet — voice in, memory-enriched context, execution out, all in one desktop app.
By Agent Software
Four tools, one surface
Agent Wispr, Agent Brain, and Agent Harness each solve a specific problem — voice capture, memory, and execution. Agent Terminal is where those three actually meet, inside one native desktop app, rather than requiring someone to manually copy context between separate windows.
The loop, step by step
Speak a goal into Wispr, and the transcript gets normalized into terminal context items that can be pinned for reuse across a session. Brain enriches that context with relevant memory pulled from past work. Before anything reaches a model, a pre-send guard evaluates whether the prompt should be reused from a prior answer, rewritten to cut tokens, or sent as written — a real cost-control step, not a cosmetic one. Harness then handles the actual execution, delegated out from the same terminal window.
Why the guard step matters on its own
The pre-send guard is a pure decision engine with tunable thresholds — a minimum token savings before a rewrite is worth doing, a minimum confidence before reusing a prior answer instead of asking again. That's a deliberate cost lever: it exists specifically so repeated or near-duplicate prompts don't silently rack up spend.
What happens when a dependency is down
Terminal is built to keep working in degraded mode — if Brain or Harness is temporarily unavailable, the terminal still launches work and manages sessions, and clearly reports which dependency failed rather than failing silently or blocking entirely. That's a deliberate design choice: a tool this central to a daily workflow shouldn't become unusable the moment one dependency has a bad day.
What it's explicitly not
Terminal doesn't try to be the source of truth for memory, and it doesn't claim final execution authority over what Harness does — it's the surface where those capabilities come together, not a replacement for either of them. Scoping it that tightly is part of why the four-product loop holds together instead of becoming one more monolith.
